Hey Steven, that last line should be corrected - it's for welfare fraud of less than $25,000 (not $950). But hey, who's counting? We know the Dems aren't, right?
Oh, and let's not forget the California Democrats new effort to block a bill that would make it a felony to buy someone under 18 (a child) for sex. Democrats now insist that buying someone age 16 or 17 should only be a misdemeanor, not a felony.
The article describes two kind of welfare fraud consequences: "Under SB 560, individuals would not face criminal charges for overpayments under $25,000 if the errors were ... administrative mistakes ... The bill also proposes eliminating criminal penalties for attempted welfare fraud involving less than $950."
So the Statewide Automated Welfare System could make a "mistake" worth $24,999 and that would not be "criminal fraud." And anyone who actually intends to commit criminal fraud worth $949 will also not be a "criminal."
Which sounds remarkably like what happened under Prop. 47. If SB 560 passes, reasonable people should expect to see a tsunami of welfare fraud in the "less than $950" category.
Yes, especially when a "county human services agency" would "determine whether benefits were authorized" as a result of an automated error and, if so, "prohibit the agency from referring a case for criminal action."
All of those government "human service" workers are union members who vote for sanctuary cities.
The following is how you should have written your article. It would have been more direct and succinct.
Intro: Democrats are assholes!
Body: Democrats really are assholes!
Conclusion: Democrats, and specifically Adam Schiff, continue to be assholes!
🤔 😉
The Democrats: Lemmings, led by Wolves.
Soooo in other words, the Dems will do more of the same- nothing?
“Never do anything about a major problem we have to address” is a plank of the Dem platform.
Why oh why oh why are we telling them?!?!
Hey Steven, that last line should be corrected - it's for welfare fraud of less than $25,000 (not $950). But hey, who's counting? We know the Dems aren't, right?
Oh, and let's not forget the California Democrats new effort to block a bill that would make it a felony to buy someone under 18 (a child) for sex. Democrats now insist that buying someone age 16 or 17 should only be a misdemeanor, not a felony.
https://www.kcra.com/article/california-lawmakers-block-ab-379-sex-trafficking/64614165
The article describes two kind of welfare fraud consequences: "Under SB 560, individuals would not face criminal charges for overpayments under $25,000 if the errors were ... administrative mistakes ... The bill also proposes eliminating criminal penalties for attempted welfare fraud involving less than $950."
So the Statewide Automated Welfare System could make a "mistake" worth $24,999 and that would not be "criminal fraud." And anyone who actually intends to commit criminal fraud worth $949 will also not be a "criminal."
Which sounds remarkably like what happened under Prop. 47. If SB 560 passes, reasonable people should expect to see a tsunami of welfare fraud in the "less than $950" category.
I would expect to see a tsunami of welfare “administrative mistakes” of around $24,500.
Yes, especially when a "county human services agency" would "determine whether benefits were authorized" as a result of an automated error and, if so, "prohibit the agency from referring a case for criminal action."
All of those government "human service" workers are union members who vote for sanctuary cities.
https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB560/id/3134955